____ _ | __ )| | ___ __ _ | _ \| |/ _ \ / _` | | |_) | | (_) | (_| | |____/|_|\___/ \__, | |___/_ _ _/_| |__ ___ _ __| |_ _ _/_ / _ \ '_ \ / _ \ '__| | | | |/ _ \ __/ |_) | __/ | | | |_| | __/ \___|_.__/ \___|_| |_|\__,_|\___|
[2026-05-18][Daily]
commit: 5a06d02f867e1dd12d46154639a90836decb95dd
It's weird that Malphite schedulers results are almost all the same. Their cpu usage is all great
On Poppy, we observe similar results. It might be that homegeneous CPUs tend to gain less from schedulers compared to heterogeneous CPU as on Rammus. The random scheduler is strangely, very effective. Work stealing tend to be less effective on smaller datasets.